Print the page
Increase font size
NUUK TRUMP TOWER!

Posted January 22, 2026

Sean Ring

By Sean Ring

NUUK TRUMP TOWER!

Ursula von der Leyen: “We’re going to Nuuk Trump Tower!”

Mark Rutte: “No, Ursula. We’re not nuking Daddy. We need him for NATO.”

Ursula: “No, you bumbling fool! We’re going to Nuuk… you know… the capital of Greenland, for the grand opening of Daddy’s new phallic spectacle.”

Rutte: “Oh. Of course. Mmmmm… I can’t wait to see it. And we don’t have any weapons anyway.”

I hope he builds it. I hope he was lying when he posted this in 2019:

pub

Talk about a once-in-a-lifetime gambling experience! And plenty of snow bunnies to satisfy the high rollers, to boot!

Ok. Enough of the tomfoolery. Let’s review what happened.

How Dare You?

When The Donald first floated the idea of buying Greenland, the political class reached for a collective cold towel. Editorial boards reached for smelling salts. Diplomats gasped so hard they sucked the air out of the room. Late-night hosts dusted off “orange man wants ice cube” jokes. As usual, the endgame sailed over their heads.

But they always forget Trump negotiates like a casino developer with a wrecking ball and a stopwatch. He’s not a diplomat. He doesn’t open with the compromise. He opens with the moon, watches everyone panic, and then graciously “settles” for something that would have been unthinkable five minutes earlier.

That’s exactly what just happened in the Arctic.

What Washington now gets is autonomous, expanded U.S. air and missile-defense basing rights, long-term access corridors, and preferential resource cooperation.

So, not the whole island. Just the parts that actually matter to America. Greenland stays Danish on paper. The United States gets the leverage. Everyone declares victory.

The man’s a maestro, and he played everyone like an orchestra.

The Art of the Negotiation

The game plan is to start absurd and end inevitable.

Trump’s opening bid of “We should own Greenland” was about anchoring the conversation so far out on the horizon that every subsequent step feels reasonable by comparison. Once he said, “entire island,” “permanent autonomous U.S. air bases with missile defense, early-warning radar, and logistical hubs” sounds downright modest.

And notice how the walk-back works. Trump doesn’t retreat. He reframes. The goal shifts from sovereignty to security. From purchase to partnership. From flags to runways. The media calls it a climb-down. Negotiators call it a win.

This is textbook Trump: start with a maximalist demand, ignite elite and public outrage, get concessions, and land the asset.

The Danes get to say they protected national pride. Greenland’s local authorities get to talk about autonomy and investment.

The Pentagon gets what it actually wanted all along: hardened Arctic infrastructure without the waking nightmare of political annexation.

The funny part is how predictable the outrage cycle was. The same people who roll their eyes at Trump’s “bombast” fall for it every time. They still think the opening line is the policy. It isn’t. It’s the lever.

Reiterating Why Greenland Is Strategically Critical

Strip away the President’s theatrics, and you’ve got cold, hard geography.

Greenland is one side of the GIUK Gap (Greenland-Iceland-UK). That all-important spot has defined Atlantic naval and air strategy since the Cold War. Control the sensors, airfields, and undersea monitoring here, and you don’t just own the North Atlantic. Russian subs don’t sneak into the open ocean without you knowing. Bomber routes light up like Christmas trees.

Then there’s missile defense. Russia’s Oreshnik missiles shrink warning times because they’re hypersonic. Greenland is one of the few places where forward-deployed radar and interceptor architecture make sense for tracking and, if necessary, engaging polar trajectories aimed at North America. Alaska alone doesn’t cut it. Early warning is about geometry, not politics.

Finally, Greenland sits on a treasure trove of rare earths and critical minerals—neodymium, dysprosium, terbium—the unglamorous inputs that make missiles steer, jets fly, and electronics hum. And much of that mineral wealth isn’t under the ice. It’s buried under some ice-free coastal areas. (Just one more reason to believe in God and that he loves America.)

China dominates rare earths processing. The U.S. needs to correct that imbalance.

But America doesn’t need to own Greenland to secure those supply chains. You need access, investment rights, infrastructure, and security guarantees. That’s what this deal quietly locks in.

In other words, Greenland is valuable because it sits at the crossroads of 21st-century warfare, surveillance, and industry.

The Lazy Danes Are Lucky

Which brings us to Denmark.

I love the place. I wrote an article about how safe and clean Copenhagen is.

But let’s be blunt: Denmark got lucky.

For decades, Copenhagen treated Greenland like a sentimental relic with a maintenance bill. It was strategic neglect wrapped in progressive rhetoric. They barely invested in defense. They didn’t develop their abundant resources. The assumption was that the U.S. would always pick up the security tab anyway.

The Donald just destroyed that assumption.

Denmark failed to seriously develop Greenland’s rare earth potential when it had first mover advantage. It failed to build out robust Arctic infrastructure. It failed to treat the island as the strategic crown jewel it is. Then it acted “Shocked! Shocked!” when an American president noticed.

In a harsher world, that kind of negligence gets punished. Assets drift. Influence erodes. Control slips quietly into other hands. Instead, Denmark gets a face-saving deal where it retains sovereignty, avoids the capital expenditure, and lets the U.S. do the military and financial heavy lifting.

The undertones here are uncomfortable for Europe. Security guarantees are now conditional. Strategic geography unused is strategic geography lost.

Wrap-Up

So no, Trump didn’t “lose” Greenland. He extracted what mattered: bases, sensors, access, minerals, and leverage.

In an era of shrinking warning times, weaponized supply chains, and Arctic re-militarization, Greenland is critical. Trump understood that long before the talking heads remembered where it was on a map.

The Danes can sigh with relief. The Pentagon can quietly get to work. And the rest of the world just got another reminder of how Trump negotiates: demand the impossible, settle for the essential, and let everyone else congratulate themselves for surviving the opening bid.

It was glorious to behold.

Yen and the Art of Market Maintenance

Yen and the Art of Market Maintenance

Posted January 21, 2026

By Sean Ring

💴The Yen Carry Trade Is Cracking. Wall Street Should Be Nervous.
From Oil Sheikhs to Mineral Mandarins

From Oil Sheikhs to Mineral Mandarins

Posted January 20, 2026

By Matt Badiali

The parallels between oil and strategic minerals continue to grow.
Rickards on Venezuela

Rickards on Venezuela

Posted January 19, 2026

By Jim Rickards

The immense global repercussions are just beginning to be felt.
And The Queen’s Bank Was No More…

And The Queen’s Bank Was No More…

Posted January 16, 2026

By Sean Ring

Moving the filth from London to Singapore couldn’t save Barings 31 years ago.
Passing Notes to Avoid War

Passing Notes to Avoid War

Posted January 15, 2026

By Sean Ring

Have Israel and Iran secretly sent love letters behind the U.S.’s back?
RIP, Scott Adams

RIP, Scott Adams

Posted January 14, 2026

By Sean Ring

Scott Adams’ example demonstrates that dying with the love of millions beats making the millions.